A Calvin Theological Seminary Publication by Students & Alumni
Book Review: The New Testament In Its World

Book Review: The New Testament In Its World

INTRODUCTION

The book (New Testament in its World) is intended to introduce readers to the New Testament and Wright’s academic works in a new way, with the goal of introducing readers to Jesus, the early church, and the literature that evolved from that setting; “to cultivate a commitment to a specific account of Christian history, literature, theology, and mission” (25). The two theologians incorporate an innovative pedagogic technique as they proceed from topic to topic and New Testament book to book: a series of letters from a hypothetical seminary student to one of his professors inquiring about typical issues that come up from the initial difficulty of examining Scripture critically. The book’s content is separated into 9 parts: Instruction on how to read the New Testament is covered in Part 1 together with hermeneutics, history, literature, and theology. The background information in Part 2 covers the history of the Jews between the Persian and Roman Empires, the Greco-Roman era, and the Jewish setting in which Jesus and the early church developed. Jesus is briefly discussed in Parts 3 and 4, which also look at his passion, death, and resurrection. Following an introduction to Paul, each individual book of the Pauline set is discussed in Part 5. The Gospels and the Catholic Epistles are covered in Parts 6 and 7, and the final two parts explain how we came to have the New Testament and how we make it relevant for today.

MAIN ARGUMENTS

“Reading the New Testament” is the first section of the writers’ introduction. The two experts’ enthusiasm for Scripture, theology, and Christ’s church is immediately apparent to the reader. Here’s what the authors have to say about it: “The New Testament, then, is the manual of mission because it is first manual of worship.  We do not worship a distant or remote deity, but the God who made the world and is remaking it.  Our mission is not to rescue souls away from the world, but to bring God’s rescuing love and glory into every corner of creation.” (p. 44) The belief that the world is a corrupt and evil place, and that Christians long to be redeemed from it, is already widespread among Nigerian congregations. It is encouraging to read in this book that the goal of the New Testament is to spread God’s love and glory over all of creation, including the entire planet.

Wright and Bird take the intriguing decision to use the Letter to Philemon as his “launching pad” to establish Paul’s theology in the book’s section on “Paul and the Faithfulness of God.” He makes a strong case for the pastoral nature of Paul’s theology, “in the sense that the shepherd needs to feed the flock with clean food and water, and keep an eye out for wolves.” (366). Thus far, the three main focuses of Paul’s theology, according to Wright and Bird, are monotheism, election (as he interprets it), and eschatology (370). They, however, lays out their justifications for what Paul was saying in the section on Romans.

I enjoyed the choice to include a lengthy quotation from Luther regarding his rediscovery of justification by faith in this volume (512). Luther disapproved of the notion that God’s justice in punishing sin was meant by “the righteousness of God” in Romans 1:17. Luther was aware of his own sins and how worthy of God’s wrath he was. This significant verse transformed into a delightful “gateway to heaven” when Luther came to see “the righteousness of God” as the righteousness by which God saves sinners by grace through faith.  Wright seems to acknowledge that while this gift is a result of “God’s loyal, rescuing action,” it is not the passage’s main point to discuss God’s gift of “a righteous status” to individuals (513). As opposed to this, he interprets “the righteousness of God” to mean “God’s own in-the-rightness, his faithfulness to both covenant and creation.”

In Chapter 31 “Letters by Jesus’ Brothers: James and Jude.”  Wright and Bird approach the complex problems involving James 2, They correctly assert that there has been “apparent… tension between James and Paul” (744) and that ” the apparent discrepancy between James and Paul dissipates when we observe what they are each arguing for and against. ” (745). The authors’ assertion that Paul and James can and should be harmonized could lead one to believe that they would end their argument there. Sadly, everything is undone on the following page.  James and Paul concur, according to them (authors – Wright and Bird) (746), that ” the word of truth brings salvation and transformation.” But then they go on: “James and Paul do materially disagree on the significance of Genesis 15:6. Paul employs the passage to prove that Abraham was justified prior to his circumcision; James opts for a standard Jewish approach that read Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac (Gen. 22) as the reason he had righteousness credited to him proleptically in Genesis 15:6. Different readings of the same text merely show that Paul and James are part of the richly diverse traditions of Jewish scripture-reading.

Should there be any questions regarding what Wright and Bird are stating, they are answered by Table 31.2: “James and Paul on ‘Faith’ and ‘Works,'” which is directly related to this remark and is located on the same page. James’ alleged ideas on “works” are summed up in the column with the definition: “Loving expression of faith in action. These kinds of works are necessary for justification. In other words, Wright and Bird seems to be arguing that James’ teachings require works as part of justification, not only as proof that someone genuinely has saving faith. 

My view of this Book

The book’s main strength is its in-depth historical research and thoughts of how the New Testament is still applicable in the modern world. I’ve read some of the most easily readable but thoughtful summaries of the historical eras, the Jewish and Greco-Roman background. I like how they discuss each New Testament book separately. Every book has an introduction at the outset that sets the scene. Only after that, with paragraphs summarizing what is found in each portion of the book, arguments and background information are fully discussed. Finally, a bigger picture is presented, relating the book to actual events, for this reason alone, the book is a pleasure to read.

The structure and length of the book are by far its main flaws. The length will put off some people. The book’s opening sections—Parts 3 and 4—start with Jesus, then jump to Paul in Part 5, before returning to the Gospels in Part 6. This is where I feel the most lost. The Pauline section includes the canon of Paul, while the Jesus section is divided from the Gospels.

CONCLUSION

The book succeeds in appealing to a broad audience. It doesn’t hesitate to tackle more challenging difficulties like authorship issues. It doesn’t read like a textbook though, which would be tedious for the typical reader. Its sections read quickly and are enjoyable. The majority of pages contain a picture, a chart, a map, or—most entertaining—regular “email” correspondences between a teacher and a dedicated pupil. The church now possesses a crucial textbook, a visually spectacular volume, amazing modern pictures of the NT’s historical context, and side galleys of key concepts and ancient authors thanks to this feature.

12,748 Comments

  1. Hey would you mind stating which blog platform you’re working with? I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a tough time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S Sorry for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  2. My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find many of your post’s to be precisely what I’m looking for. can you offer guest writers to write content for yourself? I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on a lot of the subjects you write related to here. Again, awesome blog!|

  3. This is the right blog for anybody who hopes to understand this topic. You know a whole lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I personally will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a fresh spin on a topic that’s been discussed for years. Excellent stuff, just great!|

  4. Hey! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  5. Throughout this grand pattern of things you’ll get a B+ just for effort and hard work. Where exactly you confused us was first in your details. As as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more accurate right here. Having said that, allow me tell you just what exactly did do the job. Your writing can be pretty persuasive and that is probably the reason why I am making the effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, despite the fact that I can notice the jumps in reasoning you make, I am not necessarily convinced of just how you appear to unite your details which inturn help to make the actual conclusion. For now I will subscribe to your position however wish in the future you connect your facts much better.

  6. I do enjoy the way you have presented this matter plus it does indeed give me personally a lot of fodder for consideration. On the other hand, through everything that I have witnessed, I just simply wish when the actual feed-back pack on that people today continue to be on issue and in no way get started upon a tirade of the news du jour. All the same, thank you for this fantastic piece and although I can not necessarily go along with it in totality, I respect your point of view.

  7. Definitely believe that that you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be at the web the simplest factor to keep in mind of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed at the same time as folks think about issues that they just don’t know about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and outlined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

  8. Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  9. Aw, this was a very nice post. In concept I would like to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and certainly not appear to get one thing done.

  10. Hey I am so excited I found your web site, I really found you by mistake, while I
    was browsing on Yahoo for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say many thanks for a tremendous
    post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the
    theme/design), I don’t have time to look over it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also
    included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be
    back to read much more, Please do keep up the awesome
    b.

  11. I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as
    you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

  12. An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little bit evaluation on this. And he in actual fact purchased me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If possible, as you turn out to be experience, would you thoughts updating your weblog with more details? It’s highly helpful for me. Huge thumb up for this blog submit!

  13. I do not know if it’s just me or if everyone else experiencing problems with your blog.
    It looks like some of the written text within your content are running off the screen. Can somebody else please provide
    feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well?
    This might be a issue with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before.
    Thank you

  14. Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a weblog web site? The account helped me a applicable deal. I had been a little bit familiar of this your broadcast offered bright transparent idea

  15. You really make it seem really easy together with your presentation but I find this topic to be really one thing that I feel I would by no means understand. It kind of feels too complex and very vast for me. I’m looking forward on your next put up, I will try to get the dangle of it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *