The book (New Testament in its World) is intended to introduce readers to the New Testament and Wright’s academic works in a new way, with the goal of introducing readers to Jesus, the early church, and the literature that evolved from that setting; “to cultivate a commitment to a specific account of Christian history, literature, theology, and mission” (25). The two theologians incorporate an innovative pedagogic technique as they proceed from topic to topic and New Testament book to book: a series of letters from a hypothetical seminary student to one of his professors inquiring about typical issues that come up from the initial difficulty of examining Scripture critically. The book’s content is separated into 9 parts: Instruction on how to read the New Testament is covered in Part 1 together with hermeneutics, history, literature, and theology. The background information in Part 2 covers the history of the Jews between the Persian and Roman Empires, the Greco-Roman era, and the Jewish setting in which Jesus and the early church developed. Jesus is briefly discussed in Parts 3 and 4, which also look at his passion, death, and resurrection. Following an introduction to Paul, each individual book of the Pauline set is discussed in Part 5. The Gospels and the Catholic Epistles are covered in Parts 6 and 7, and the final two parts explain how we came to have the New Testament and how we make it relevant for today.


“Reading the New Testament” is the first section of the writers’ introduction. The two experts’ enthusiasm for Scripture, theology, and Christ’s church is immediately apparent to the reader. Here’s what the authors have to say about it: “The New Testament, then, is the manual of mission because it is first manual of worship.  We do not worship a distant or remote deity, but the God who made the world and is remaking it.  Our mission is not to rescue souls away from the world, but to bring God’s rescuing love and glory into every corner of creation.” (p. 44) The belief that the world is a corrupt and evil place, and that Christians long to be redeemed from it, is already widespread among Nigerian congregations. It is encouraging to read in this book that the goal of the New Testament is to spread God’s love and glory over all of creation, including the entire planet.

Wright and Bird take the intriguing decision to use the Letter to Philemon as his “launching pad” to establish Paul’s theology in the book’s section on “Paul and the Faithfulness of God.” He makes a strong case for the pastoral nature of Paul’s theology, “in the sense that the shepherd needs to feed the flock with clean food and water, and keep an eye out for wolves.” (366). Thus far, the three main focuses of Paul’s theology, according to Wright and Bird, are monotheism, election (as he interprets it), and eschatology (370). They, however, lays out their justifications for what Paul was saying in the section on Romans.

I enjoyed the choice to include a lengthy quotation from Luther regarding his rediscovery of justification by faith in this volume (512). Luther disapproved of the notion that God’s justice in punishing sin was meant by “the righteousness of God” in Romans 1:17. Luther was aware of his own sins and how worthy of God’s wrath he was. This significant verse transformed into a delightful “gateway to heaven” when Luther came to see “the righteousness of God” as the righteousness by which God saves sinners by grace through faith.  Wright seems to acknowledge that while this gift is a result of “God’s loyal, rescuing action,” it is not the passage’s main point to discuss God’s gift of “a righteous status” to individuals (513). As opposed to this, he interprets “the righteousness of God” to mean “God’s own in-the-rightness, his faithfulness to both covenant and creation.”

In Chapter 31 “Letters by Jesus’ Brothers: James and Jude.”  Wright and Bird approach the complex problems involving James 2, They correctly assert that there has been “apparent… tension between James and Paul” (744) and that ” the apparent discrepancy between James and Paul dissipates when we observe what they are each arguing for and against. ” (745). The authors’ assertion that Paul and James can and should be harmonized could lead one to believe that they would end their argument there. Sadly, everything is undone on the following page.  James and Paul concur, according to them (authors – Wright and Bird) (746), that ” the word of truth brings salvation and transformation.” But then they go on: “James and Paul do materially disagree on the significance of Genesis 15:6. Paul employs the passage to prove that Abraham was justified prior to his circumcision; James opts for a standard Jewish approach that read Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac (Gen. 22) as the reason he had righteousness credited to him proleptically in Genesis 15:6. Different readings of the same text merely show that Paul and James are part of the richly diverse traditions of Jewish scripture-reading.

Should there be any questions regarding what Wright and Bird are stating, they are answered by Table 31.2: “James and Paul on ‘Faith’ and ‘Works,'” which is directly related to this remark and is located on the same page. James’ alleged ideas on “works” are summed up in the column with the definition: “Loving expression of faith in action. These kinds of works are necessary for justification. In other words, Wright and Bird seems to be arguing that James’ teachings require works as part of justification, not only as proof that someone genuinely has saving faith. 

My view of this Book

The book’s main strength is its in-depth historical research and thoughts of how the New Testament is still applicable in the modern world. I’ve read some of the most easily readable but thoughtful summaries of the historical eras, the Jewish and Greco-Roman background. I like how they discuss each New Testament book separately. Every book has an introduction at the outset that sets the scene. Only after that, with paragraphs summarizing what is found in each portion of the book, arguments and background information are fully discussed. Finally, a bigger picture is presented, relating the book to actual events, for this reason alone, the book is a pleasure to read.

The structure and length of the book are by far its main flaws. The length will put off some people. The book’s opening sections—Parts 3 and 4—start with Jesus, then jump to Paul in Part 5, before returning to the Gospels in Part 6. This is where I feel the most lost. The Pauline section includes the canon of Paul, while the Jesus section is divided from the Gospels.


The book succeeds in appealing to a broad audience. It doesn’t hesitate to tackle more challenging difficulties like authorship issues. It doesn’t read like a textbook though, which would be tedious for the typical reader. Its sections read quickly and are enjoyable. The majority of pages contain a picture, a chart, a map, or—most entertaining—regular “email” correspondences between a teacher and a dedicated pupil. The church now possesses a crucial textbook, a visually spectacular volume, amazing modern pictures of the NT’s historical context, and side galleys of key concepts and ancient authors thanks to this feature.


  1. What i don’t understood is actually how you are not really much more well-liked than you may be now. You’re very intelligent. You realize thus significantly relating to this subject, produced me personally consider it from so many varied angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated unless it’s one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always maintain it up!

  2. I do agree with all of the concepts you
    have presented in your post. They are very convincing and can certainly work.
    Still, the posts are very quick for novices. May
    you please extend them a bit from next time?
    Thank you for the post.

  3. I was curious if you ever considered changing the structure of your
    site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 pictures.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  4. Simply wish to say your article is as astounding. The
    clearness in your post is just spectacular and i could assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Well with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with
    forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

  5. Greetings from Florida! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the information you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, amazing site!

  6. With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my agreement. Do you know any methods to help reduce content from being ripped off? I’d definitely appreciate it.

  7. Hi! I know this is kinda off topic nevertheless I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa? My blog goes over a lot of the same subjects as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other. If you happen to be interested feel free to send me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Great blog by the way!

  8. I simply wanted to make a small comment so as to express gratitude to you for those stunning concepts you are showing on this site. My prolonged internet lookup has finally been recognized with wonderful know-how to share with my companions. I would repeat that many of us readers actually are rather fortunate to be in a useful place with so many marvellous professionals with good tactics. I feel very much grateful to have come across your entire webpages and look forward to some more amazing minutes reading here. Thank you once more for a lot of things.

  9. This is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

  10. Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, fantastic blog!

  11. I’ve been surfing on-line greater than three hours these days, but I by no means found any interesting article like yours. It is beautiful worth enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the net will likely be much more helpful than ever before.

  12. Great goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely excellent. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is actually a tremendous web site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *